Swati Maliwal assault case: The Delhi Excessive Courtroom has mentioned that the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s shut aide Bibhav Kumar in a case regarding alleged assault on the Aam Aadmi Social gathering (AAP) Member of Parliament (MP) Swati Maliwal was needed and police strictly adopted the legislation whereas doing so.
The courtroom, which on Friday (August 2) dismissed Bibhav Kumar’s petition that claimed his arrest was unlawful, mentioned in its written judgment that there was no benefit in his plea. Kumar, presently in judicial custody, allegedly assaulted Maliwal at Kejriwal’s official residence on Could 13. He was arrested by the Delhi Police on Could 18 (Saturday).
Bibhav Kumar’s plea
In his plea, Kumar had sought a path to declare his arrest as unlawful and in gross violation of the provisions of part 41A (discover of look earlier than police officer) of the Code of Felony Process (CrPC) and in opposition to the mandate of the legislation.
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, within the judgment launched on Saturday (August 3), noticed that after the arrest, the trial courtroom heard Kumar in addition to the State earlier than permitting police custody for 5 days and likewise famous that whereas the legislation gave discretion to the investigating officer to not arrest an individual in the course of the investigation, within the current circumstances, there existed ample grounds of arrest of the accused petitioner with out discover.
The courtroom mentioned a person has the appropriate to liberty as enshrined in Article 21 of the Structure and the legislation has been designed to make sure that such liberty just isn’t violated, besides by due technique of legislation.
“The details, as detailed, clearly set up that the arrest was needed within the given circumstances and has been made in strict compliance of part 41 of CrPC, 1973 by following the rules and tips as repeatedly laid down and emphasised by the apex courtroom within the judgments. In view of the foregoing dialogue, there is no such thing as a benefit within the current petition, which is hereby dismissed,” the courtroom mentioned.
It famous that in line with the police, the CCTV footage was discovered to be clean and Kumar was evasive and non-cooperative throughout his interrogation.
It added that whereas dismissing Kumar’s bail plea, one other excessive courtroom bench had additionally referred to suppression of essential proof as solely selective CCTV footage was handed over and the cell phone was reformatted by the accused, which mirrored an effort to hide important proof as message was alleged to have been forwarded by the complainant, Swati Maliwal, to the petitioner by means of WhatsApp on reaching the Chief Minister’s Workplace (CMO).
Felony case pending in opposition to Bibhav Kumar’s in Noida
The courtroom mentioned a replica of the remand utility was made obtainable to Kumar earlier than the trial courtroom after his arrest, to which he had additionally filed a reply, and there are prison antecedents since there’s a prison case pending in opposition to him in Uttar Pradesh’s Noida.
Within the remand utility, the courtroom famous, the police had alleged that regardless of his termination from the put up of personal secretary to the chief minister by the competent authority, Kumar was discovered to proceed to work on the premises and was unable to provide any reply to elucidate his authority underneath which he continued to work.
Delhi Excessive Courtroom denies bail to Bibhav Kumar
His bail utility was earlier dismissed by the trial courtroom and the excessive courtroom and is pending earlier than the Supreme Courtroom. The excessive courtroom denied bail to Kumar on July 12, saying he enjoys appreciable affect and no floor to grant him the aid was made out.
Within the petition in opposition to his unlawful arrest, Kumar had additionally sought acceptable compensation and initiation of departmental motion in opposition to the erring officers. The Delhi Police had opposed the petition and submitted that Kumar was not arrested in haste and was taken into custody in line with legislation.
ALSO READ: Swati Maliwal assault case: Does this type of ‘goon’…? Supreme Courtroom’s large rebuke to Bibhav Kumar
ALSO READ: Swati Maliwal assault case: Bibhav Kumar strikes Supreme Courtroom in opposition to Delhi HC’s bail order
