NEW DELHI: Hardik Pandya‘s return to Mumbai Indians as skipper was anticipated to mark a brand new starting for the staff. Nevertheless, the truth has been removed from that, with MI mired in chaos amidst a lackluster IPL 2024 season.
At the moment positioned eighth within the factors desk with simply six factors from eight video games, the five-time champions are in dire want of inspiration from Pandya, who beforehand led Gujarat Titans to exceptional success.
Critics, together with Simon Doull and Adam Gilchrist, have voiced their disappointment with Pandya’s captaincy throughout discussions on Cricbuzz.
IPL 2024: POINTS TABLE | ORANGE CAP | PURPLE CAP
Whereas Doull acknowledged Pandya’s previous success at Gujarat, he emphasised that Pandya nonetheless had room for development as a captain.
“It’s a powerful factor to come back and take over a franchise that’s so storied and profitable. He clearly had good captaincy expertise at Gujarat, you do not lose these. I feel he’s rising into it however he is nonetheless bought work to do,” mentioned Doull.

Nevertheless, it was Gilchrist’s evaluation that struck a chord, as he identified deficiencies in Pandya’s strategic decision-making.

“I’m not seeing him strategically getting it proper. I feel some batting positional modifications, some bowling modifications at sure instances, simply total technique, I do not suppose as captain he is fairly bought it proper,” Gilchrist remarked, highlighting issues concerning batting and bowling modifications and total technique.
Gilchrist’s statement underscores the challenges Pandya faces in main MI to success. His wrestle with MI raises issues for the BCCI, who view him as a possible successor to Rohit Sharma‘s captaincy.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here