Sri Lanka assistant coach Naveed Nawaz acknowledged that they might must seek the advice of with Andy Pycroft, the match referee for Bangladesh’s second T20I towards the guests, to accumulate a transparent image of a disputed choice made by the on-field umpire within the sport in Sylhet on Wednesday.
Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka, 2nd T20I: Highlights | Report
The incident unfolded throughout the early levels of the match when Sri Lankan pacer Binura Fernando induced an edge from Bangladesh batter Saumya Sarkar, resulting in an on-field dismissal name. Nonetheless, upon assessment, TV umpire Masudur Rahman overturned the choice, citing a scarcity of conclusive proof to assist the preliminary name. The reversal of the choice didn’t sit properly with the Sri Lankan camp, notably assistant coach Naveed Nawaz, who expressed his dissatisfaction with the end result.
“The on-field umpire had given him out and I’m positive the TV umpire received to have conclusive proof to overturn the on-field umpire’s choice,” stated Nawaz. “We’ve not seen the footage or something like that nevertheless it was clear that there was a spike, we noticed it on the massive display and we’d need to take it as much as the match referee and see what truly occurred there. The footage that we now have received on our screens weren’t sufficient to say something however I’m positive the TV umpire had proof to overturn the choice.”
Soumya was heading again after seeing the spike on the massive display, however TV umpire Masudur Rahman decided that the spike arrived one body too late to be an edge off the bat, concluding that there was an area between bat and ball when the spike appeared. Sri Lankan gamers gathered across the on-field umpire for solutions. Soumya didn’t final lengthy on the crease, however the incident did put the guests on the again foot psychologically.
“I imply it was massive difficulty and the primary wicket and it might have given us a head begin. Clearly on a monitor like this any wicket is essential,” Naveed stated.
