Signal as much as IndyEat’s free publication for weekly recipes, foodie options and cookbook releases
Get our foods and drinks publication free of charge
David Chang, chef and founding father of Momofuku restaurant group, has sparked backlash over the corporate’s try to personal the only rights to the time period “chili crunch”. Now, small enterprise house owners have accused Momofuku of trademark bullying.
The controversy started earlier this month when the Michelin-starred chef’s meals empire filed a trademark for “chili crunch” – a spicy condiment notably discovered throughout many Asian cultures – with the US Patent and Trademark Workplace (USPTO). Whereas the corporate doesn’t personal the rights to the phrase simply but, it subsequently despatched out cease-and-desist letters to a number of meals corporations that use the phrase “chili crunch” or “chile crunch” on their product labels, The Guardian reported.
Within the cease-and-desist letter obtained by the outlet, Momofuku acknowledged that it has been “providing” its chili crunch product since 2018 and promoting jars of the chili crunch since 2020. The letter additionally acknowledged that the corporate has “developed priceless frequent legislation rights” – a trademark that’s been established solely via use in commerce however not registered with the USPTO – to its chili crunch trademark. Momofuku cited the product’s recognition as proof for its frequent legislation proper to trademark chili crunch.
Nevertheless, Momofuku was removed from the primary Asian-American model to carry the crispy chili oil to the mainstream. In truth, chili crisp, chili oil, or crunchy chili sauce are completely different phrases used to explain basically the identical product: a preferred Chinese language condiment made with onion, garlic, and completely different spices infused in oil. It’s been utilized in quite a lot of Asian dishes, resembling drizzled over dumplings or noodles.
Michelle Tew, founding father of the Malaysian meals model Homiah, was one of many recipients of Momofuku’s cease-and-desist letter. Talking to The Guardian, Tew defined that Homiah’s chili crunch product, Sambal Chili Crunch, is predicated on her Malaysian household’s recipe. In a put up shared to LinkedIn, Tew described receiving the cease-and-desist letter as a “punch within the intestine” and defined her shock {that a} “well-known and revered participant within the Asian meals trade would legally threaten me, a one-woman present working on a a lot smaller scale, from promoting a product that’s a part of my household’s historical past and tradition”. Nonetheless, her model reportedly has 90 days to stop using the chili crunch trademark.
“The phrase that I’d use to seek advice from Momofuku on this case, is a trademark bully,” lawyer Stephen Coates, who’s representing Homiah, instructed The Guardian. “It is a clear case of them selecting on small companies with a letter marketing campaign hoping they’ll cave due to the monetary stress.”
Momofuku was based in 2004 with the opening of Momofuku Noodle Bar in New York Metropolis, and Chang rapidly grew to become credited with the rise of latest Asian-American delicacies. Since then, he’s opened greater than a dozen eating places throughout North America, and partnered with pastry chef Christina Tosi to open Momofuku Milk Bar. Chang is price an estimated $60m, whereas his Momofuku empire generated $50m in gross sales final yr, in response to CEO Marguerite Zabar Mariscal.
MìLà, a Seattle-based meals model that specialises in soup dumplings, additionally acquired a cease-and-desist letter from Momofuku over its MìLà Chili Crunch. “It feels prefer it’s not achieved with good intent, like, doubtlessly boxing out smaller rivals and attempting to personal an area that’s powerful to personal,” mentioned MìLà co-owner Caleb Wang about Momofuku’s makes an attempt to trademark chili crunch.
Whereas the meals firm hasn’t been granted the rights to “chili crunch” by the USPTO, it was given sole possession of the phrase “chile crunch” in 2023. Momofuku was given the trademark following a authorized settlement with Colorado-based firm Chile Colonial, which has produced a Mexican model of chili crisp – “chile” is “chili” in Spanish – for greater than a decade.
In one other LinkedIn put up, Jing Gao – founder and CEO of the Sichuan Chili Crisp firm, Fly By Jing – maintained that the chile crunch trademark “ought to by no means have been granted” to Momofuku as a result of it’s a “generic and descriptive time period for a culturally particular condiment, one which has existed in Chinese language culinary tradition for lots of of years”.
“I’m disheartened to listen to that Momofuku is utilizing a trademark with a validity that’s tenuous at greatest to go after quite a few manufacturers together with small minority girls based companies,” Gao mentioned. “This sort of motion, if profitable, units a harmful precedent for the squashing of honest competitors, to not point out how ridiculous it’s to attempt to take possession of a generic cultural time period.”
To obtain approval from the USPTO for its chili crunch trademark, Momofuku might want to show that the phrase “chili crunch” has “distinctiveness via in depth use in commerce over a few years”, per the USPTO web site. The method to register a trademark usually takes 12 to 18 months.
The Unbiased has contacted Momofuku for remark.
