Harbhajan defined, “When Virat Kohli bought out, the ball was excessive.It was a slower supply. There was a whole lot of debate about whether or not it must be deemed as no ball as a result of the ball was above the waistline. Virat was standing outdoors the crease and when you’re that far hawkeye measures the waistline from the popping crease (the white line).”
“This yr BCCI has measured the peak of every participant and if the ball passes above the waistline then it’s given a no ball if not then the choice isn’t given,” the previous India worldwide added.
He additional elaborated, “The ball was going to dip as a result of it was a slower one. If the ball was bowled with tempo, it might have been a no ball. He was given out in keeping with the rule. I imagine that the ball would have dipped if he had stayed within the crease.”
Reacting to the dismissal, Kohli contested the choice with seen frustration, even resorting to hitting a trash can along with his gloves as he walked again to the pavilion after his dismissal.
ALSO CHECK: IPL 2024 ORANGE CAP LIST
RCB skipper Faf du Plessis additionally chimed in, stating, “Clearly, the foundations are the foundations. Virat and myself at that stage thought that probably the ball was increased than his waist. I suppose they measure it on the popping crease… In these conditions, you may all the time have one group that is pleased and one group that does not really feel prefer it’s fairly the appropriate resolution. However that is simply how the sport works.”
(Inputs from ANI)
