NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court docket on Tuesday mentioned that candidates needn’t disclose each movable property owned by them.
The highest courtroom upheld the 2019 election of the Impartial MLA Karikho Kri from the Tezu meeting constituency in Arunachal Pradesh and asserted that that voter’s proper to know is just not absolute.
Within the election petition, it was contended by the unsuccessful candidate that the Karikho Kri exercised undue affect by not disclosing three autos owned by Kri’s spouse and son whereas submitting the nomination for contesting the election.
The bench of justices Anirudhha Bose and Sanjay Kumar put aside the order of the Gauhati excessive courtroom which had declared the election of Karikho Kri as null and void.
The highest courtroom upheld the 2019 election of the Impartial MLA Karikho Kri from the Tezu meeting constituency in Arunachal Pradesh and asserted that that voter’s proper to know is just not absolute.
Within the election petition, it was contended by the unsuccessful candidate that the Karikho Kri exercised undue affect by not disclosing three autos owned by Kri’s spouse and son whereas submitting the nomination for contesting the election.
The bench of justices Anirudhha Bose and Sanjay Kumar put aside the order of the Gauhati excessive courtroom which had declared the election of Karikho Kri as null and void.
