A 30 million year-old fossil whale might not be the heaviest animal of all time in any case, in accordance with a brand new evaluation by paleontologists at UC Davis and the Smithsonian Establishment. The brand new evaluation places Perucetus colossus again in the identical weight vary as fashionable whales and smaller than the biggest blue whales ever recorded. The work is revealed Feb. 29 in PeerJ.
A fossil skeleton of Perucetus was found in Peru and described in a paper in Nature final 12 months. The animal lived about 39 million years in the past and belonged to an extinct group of early whales known as the basilosaurids.
Perucetus’ bones are unusually dense. Mammal bones normally have a stable exterior and are spongy or hole within the middle. Some animals have extra of the middle stuffed in with stable bone, making them dense and heavy. In aquatic animals, heavy bones can offset buoyancy from physique fats and blubber, permitting the animal to take care of impartial buoyancy in water or — within the case of the hippopotamus — to stroll on river beds.
The fossil whale bones have each intensive in-filling and additional development of bone on the skin as nicely, a situation known as pachyostosis additionally seen in some fashionable aquatic mammals, comparable to manatees.
Primarily based on a sequence of assumptions, the unique authors (Giovanni Bianucci on the College of Pisa, Italy and colleagues) estimated a physique mass for Perucetus of 180 metric tons (starting from 85 to 340 metric tons). This might make Perucetus as heavy as, or heavier than the largest blue whales recognized, regardless that it’s significantly shorter at 17 meters lengthy in comparison with a blue whale at about 30 meters.
The best way to weigh a whale?
Professor Ryosuke Motani, a paleobiologist on the UC Davis Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, stated that these estimates would make Perucetus impossibly dense.
“It could have been a job for the whale to remain on the floor, and even to depart the ocean backside — it could have required steady swimming in opposition to the gravity to do something within the water,” Motani stated.
Motani and Nick Pyenson on the Smithsonian Institute Nationwide Museum of Pure Historical past reexamined the assumptions used to make these estimates.
The primary downside is that Bianucci et al used the fossil bones to estimate the burden of the skeleton, then extrapolated to the burden of your complete animal, assuming that the skeletal and non-skeletal mass would scale on the similar charge with rising physique measurement. However measurements of different animals present this isn’t the case, Motani and Pyenson argue.
The unique estimates additionally overestimated how a lot general physique mass will increase because of pachyostosis. However proof from manatees reveals that their our bodies are comparatively gentle relative to their skeletal mass.
Motani and Pyenson estimate that the 17-meter lengthy Perucetus weighed in at 60 to 70 tons, significantly lower than the recognized weights of blue whales. A Perucetus that grew to twenty meters might weigh over 110 tons, nonetheless nicely in need of the biggest blue whales at 270 tons.
“The brand new weight permits the whale to come back to the floor and keep there whereas respiratory and recovering from a dive, like most whales do,” Motani stated.
Paleontologists haven’t but uncovered a cranium or tooth of Perucetus, so it’s exhausting to inform what it ate. Sustaining an enormous physique takes a whole lot of meals. Bianucci et al prompt that Perucetus may need browsed on coastal fish and shellfish, or scavenged carcases, as some sharks do. The brand new slimmed-down measurement estimate places Perucetus in an analogous vary to sperm whales (80 tons, 20 meters lengthy), which hunt massive prey comparable to big squid.
