The corporate maintained that it was not ready to verify if the order was delivered(Consultant Picture)
The client claimed he by no means obtained the ice cream, however the standing on the Swiggy app confirmed ‘delivered’ after an agent picked it up for supply
A client courtroom in Bengaluru not too long ago directed on-line meals ordering platform Swiggy to pay Rs 5,000 to a buyer for not delivering an ice cream ordered utilizing the meals supply app in 2023. The associated fee features a compensation quantity of Rs 3,000 and Rs 2,000 litigation prices.
Observing that there was a “deficiency of service” and “unfair commerce apply”, the Bangalore City II Further District Shopper Redressal Fee additionally directed the platform, owned by Bundl Applied sciences, to refund the quantity of Rs 187 paid by the shopper whereas ordering the ice cream, the Bar and Bench reported.
“We’re of the thought of view that the complainant has proved that there’s a deficiency of service on the a part of the OP [Opposite party/Swiggy) since OP has not refunded the amount paid by the complainant though the ordered product has not been delivered to the complainant. The said acts of the OP amounts to deficiency of service and also unfair trade practice,” the consumer forum said in its ruling.
The customer had reportedly placed an order for ‘Nutty Death by Chocolate’ ice cream from the ‘Cream Stone Ice Cream’ restaurant via Swiggy on January 26 last year.
The customer claimed he never received the ice cream, but the status on the Swiggy app showed ‘delivered’ after an agent picked it up for delivery. When the customer approached the delivery platform with a complaint, Swiggy failed to refund the pre-paid order amount. This prompted the customer to approach the consumer forum for relief.
In court, Swiggy invoked provisions of the Information Technology Act and countered that it was only an intermediary between the customer and third-party restaurants and could not be held liable for the alleged mistake of its delivery boy.
The company maintained that it was not in a position to check if the order was delivered, particularly when it was marked as delivered on the app
The court, however, rejected Swiggy’s contention that it was protected from liability and observed that the exemption was limited to the dissemination of information and not applicable to the sale of goods and services.
Further, it ordered Swiggy to refund Rs 187 pre-order amount and pay Rs 3,000 as compensation and Rs 2,000 as litigation costs to the complainant.
Explore Live updates on the Lok Sabha Elections 2024 News . Check Lok Sabha Election 2024 Phase 3 Schedule, Key Candidates And Constituencies At News18 Website.
