Reported By: Salil Tiwari
Final Up to date: March 06, 2024, 18:23 IST
The involved officer additionally appeared and accepted that he had inadvertently challaned the improper automobile.
(Representational picture/PTI)
Particular Cellular Justice of the Peace (Visitors) Mudasar Farooq famous that the applicant was not current on the spot on the day of the prevalence. Subsequently, he held the challan faulty and dismissed it
A Justice of the Peace courtroom in Jammu and Kashmir’s capital Srinagar just lately ordered a site visitors policeman to pay Rs 1,000 as compensation for erroneously issuing an e-challan in opposition to the improper automobile. The courtroom held that the challan had been wrongfully issued because of the inadvertence and carelessness of the officer.
The proprietor of the automobile approached the courtroom of Particular Cellular Justice of the Peace (Visitors), Srinagar, by submitting an software in search of dismissal of the challan.
The automobile proprietor submitted that the challan was to be despatched to a different scooty, however the site visitors official issued a challan in opposition to his automobile for being with no helmet beneath the availability of Part 177 of the MV Act and imposed a effective of Rs 1,000.
He argued that because of the mistake dedicated by the officers of the site visitors division, he needed to undergo a loss and needed to spend his valuable money and time on the error which was dedicated by the division.
The involved officer additionally appeared and accepted that he had inadvertently challaned the improper automobile.
Particular Cellular Justice of the Peace (Visitors) Mudasar Farooq famous that the applicant was not current on the spot on the day of the prevalence. Subsequently, he held the challan faulty and dismissed it.
Together with ordering compensation for the applicant, the courtroom ordered the faulty challan to be taken down and directed the SSP Visitors of Srinagar Metropolis to institute an e-challan in opposition to the precise violator.
Furthermore, whereas noting that it appeared that both the site visitors cops manning the system weren’t absolutely skilled to function the e- challaning mechanism or they weren’t taking due care and warning on the time of initiation of e-challan, the courtroom directed the SSP to sensitise the site visitors officers coping with e-challaning system, “…in order that the harmless individuals won’t be compelled to face difficulties in future”.
 Mudasar Farooq noted that the applicant was not present on the spot on the day of the occurrence. Therefore, he held the challan defective and dismissed it){kind=link}